-
Subcutaneous injections
Hey guys. I'm wondering what you're opinions are on subcutaneous injections. I'm on my first cycle currently and use HCG subcutaneously. I have read that AAS can be used subcutaneously as well. Why do I not see anyone ever talking about this. It seems like a better route to go from what I have read. You can't inject as much per shot, and have to inject more frequently; but, there is no scar tissue and almost no PIP. Personally I would rather deal with 3 quick nearly painless injections per day with no scar tissue build up than 1 more painful shot with scar tissue build up and risk of sciatic nerve damage. I'm currently taking test E intra muscularly, but wondering, if subQ works, why not? Thanks.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
To sum it up - if it was that much better of an option more people would be doing it!!
This game isn't for everyone, being big and bloated doesn't make you the man, nor does being 110lbs ripped. If you are not competing, find a happy medium. I was thin once, learned all there was to learn about steroids and got pretty big. Then learned how to eat and I got really huge.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
i was doing it .5ml once a week for my TRT and when i got my blood work done it came back the lowest it ever has around 400 when its usually 600-700
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Only I'm for my aas slin GH and peptides sub q
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
ilfirin
Hey guys. I'm wondering what you're opinions are on subcutaneous injections. I'm on my first cycle currently and use HCG subcutaneously. I have read that AAS can be used subcutaneously as well. Why do I not see anyone ever talking about this. It seems like a better route to go from what I have read. You can't inject as much per shot, and have to inject more frequently; but, there is no scar tissue and almost no PIP. Personally I would rather deal with 3 quick nearly painless injections per day with no scar tissue build up than 1 more painful shot with scar tissue build up and risk of sciatic nerve damage. I'm currently taking test E intra muscularly, but wondering, if subQ works, why not? Thanks.
You're more prone to an abscess which is painful. Also, the disperse rate is very slow when shooting sub. You could have oil buildup for days and days which can turn into an access. In common sense terms, it seems better but it's not. Shoot IM- the blood supply to the muscle is a lot more than under the skin.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
Clutch7
You're more prone to an abscess which is painful. Also, the disperse rate is very slow when shooting sub. You could have oil buildup for days and days which can turn into an access. In common sense terms, it seems better but it's not. Shoot IM- the blood supply to the muscle is a lot more than under the skin.
^^ spot on! 
----
-
Been doing it subq for trt over a year and no issues. No blood tests but feel the same as IM. Would do more than 1/2ml though as I could see there being more of an issue but like others it's mostly broscience. Seen as many online for as against with bloodwork to prove it works with more stable levels of test and estrogen.
I have to do this for the rest of my life..... That adds up to a hell of a lot injections. I will save IM for my blasts.
----
-
I knew a guy who grew what looked like a womens breast right on his belly where he injected test c subQ. It never fully went away but looks much better now. I think it may have been buildup and subsequent infection.
----
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks