-
To EQ, or not to EQ. That is the question.
I'm currently six weeks into my cycle that consists of 600mg/wk Sust, 400mg/week Tren E, and 50 mg/day Proviron. I was also hoping to run EQ on this cycle, but as some of you know there was a...shipping delay. Anyway, I had already planned on stretching this cycle out to at least 16 weeks, and if labs look good at that point, continue on to 20 weeks, but I'm not sure if I'll really be able to take full advantage of the EQ in this timeframe.
I know EQ takes a very long time to kick in, so I wanted to get some opinions on whether it would be worth it to start on this cycle, or just wait until later.
What say ye, brothers?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
I like to run EQ longer, usually 14-18 weeks, but you will still reap the benefits from 10-12 weeks of usage. For me, the appetite increase and cardiovascular endurance increase are what's unique about EQ. As far as massive LBM gains I personally don't experience that with EQ. Slow and steady, but a great addition of nutrition and training is on point.
----
-
Originally Posted by
elmo33
I like to run EQ longer, usually 14-18 weeks, but you will still reap the benefits from 10-12 weeks of usage. For me, the appetite increase and cardiovascular endurance increase are what's unique about EQ. As far as massive LBM gains I personally don't experience that with EQ. Slow and steady, but a great addition of nutrition and training is on point.
Thanks Elmo. I could definitely use the appetite increase. Sometimes it feels like I'm force feeding myself to hit my macros.
----
-
Throwing in eq for less than 10 weeks you might not fully utilise it some will say. But it's still better than not using it IMO. I usually get an increased appetite after only a week. Start now, run it for 10 weeks and if your training and food is good your gonna be left with a better physique than if you didn't
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
SC liked this post
----
-
Originally Posted by
A-Raff
Throwing in eq for less than 10 weeks you might not fully utilise it some will say. But it's still better than not using it IMO. I usually get an increased appetite after only a week. Start now, run it for 10 weeks and if your training and food is good your gonna be left with a better physique than if you didn't
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks bro!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Just curious on how long later is? When are you planning to run another granted you get good labs back and go until 20 weeks?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
Swoilder1
Just curious on how long later is? When are you planning to run another granted you get good labs back and go until 20 weeks?
Started this cycle May 29.
----
-
Your cycle as is looks pretty good. I like proviron at more than 50mg and I have run extremely similar cycles as you are on. Eq gave me anxiety btw. Worse than tren.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
SC liked this post
----
-
Originally Posted by
shred81
Your cycle as is looks pretty good. I like proviron at more than 50mg and I have run extremely similar cycles as you are on. Eq gave me anxiety btw. Worse than tren.
Thanks bro.
EQ gave you anxiety? Dang, that's no fun. So far no anxiety from the Tren, and it's been long enough that hopefully nothing crazy pops up.
I did decide to go ahead and start the EQ at 600/wk. (should've updated the thread. My bad) I'm looking forward to the potential increase in appetite, as mine has slowly faded on this run. I'll try to remember to update this thread in a while when I notice the EQ kicking in. No guarantees though, haha.
----
-
I have always wanted to run it but I just never run cycles that long to reap the benefits of it. If you do then go for it.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
SC liked this post
----
Bookmarks