• Amused
  • Angry
  • Annoyed
  • ArrgPirate
  • atwork
  • Awesome
  • Bemused
  • Cocky
  • Cool
  • Crazy
  • Crying
  • deejayn
  • Depressed
  • Down
  • drinking
  • Drunk
  • eating
  • editing
  • Embarrased
  • Enraged
  • Friendly
  • gamingpc
  • gamingps
  • gamingsteam
  • gamingxbox
  • Geeky
  • Godly
  • Happy
  • hatemailing
  • Hungry
  • Innocent
  • lagging
  • livestreaming
  • loving
  • lurking
  • Meh
  • netflix
  • nostatus
  • Poorly
  • raging
  • Sad
  • Secret
  • Shy
  • Sneaky
  • Tired
  • trolling
  • Wtf
  • youtuber
  • zombies
  • Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
    Results 1 to 10 of 37

    Thread: To EQ, or not to EQ. That is the question.

    1. #1
      BOP VETERAN
      is Fantastic
       
      I am:
      Awesome
       
      SC's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2015
      Location
      All over the US
      Posts
      1,688
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      19921

      To EQ, or not to EQ. That is the question.

      I'm currently six weeks into my cycle that consists of 600mg/wk Sust, 400mg/week Tren E, and 50 mg/day Proviron. I was also hoping to run EQ on this cycle, but as some of you know there was a...shipping delay. Anyway, I had already planned on stretching this cycle out to at least 16 weeks, and if labs look good at that point, continue on to 20 weeks, but I'm not sure if I'll really be able to take full advantage of the EQ in this timeframe.

      I know EQ takes a very long time to kick in, so I wanted to get some opinions on whether it would be worth it to start on this cycle, or just wait until later.

      What say ye, brothers?

    2. Thanks Runfromsafety thanked for this post
      Likes Runfromsafety liked this post
    3.    Sponsored Links

      ----
    4. #2
      Senior Member
      is Offseason road to 230
       
      I am:
      Happy
       
      elmo33's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2011
      Posts
      1,234
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      31210
      I like to run EQ longer, usually 14-18 weeks, but you will still reap the benefits from 10-12 weeks of usage. For me, the appetite increase and cardiovascular endurance increase are what's unique about EQ. As far as massive LBM gains I personally don't experience that with EQ. Slow and steady, but a great addition of nutrition and training is on point.

    5. ----
    6. #3
      BOP VETERAN
      is Fantastic
       
      I am:
      Awesome
       
      SC's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2015
      Location
      All over the US
      Posts
      1,688
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      19921
      Quote Originally Posted by elmo33 View Post
      I like to run EQ longer, usually 14-18 weeks, but you will still reap the benefits from 10-12 weeks of usage. For me, the appetite increase and cardiovascular endurance increase are what's unique about EQ. As far as massive LBM gains I personally don't experience that with EQ. Slow and steady, but a great addition of nutrition and training is on point.
      Thanks Elmo. I could definitely use the appetite increase. Sometimes it feels like I'm force feeding myself to hit my macros.

    7. ----
    8. #4
      AUSSIE MEMBER
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       
      A-Raff's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2015
      Posts
      108
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      901
      Throwing in eq for less than 10 weeks you might not fully utilise it some will say. But it's still better than not using it IMO. I usually get an increased appetite after only a week. Start now, run it for 10 weeks and if your training and food is good your gonna be left with a better physique than if you didn't


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    9. Likes SC liked this post
    10. ----
    11. #5
      BOP VETERAN
      is Fantastic
       
      I am:
      Awesome
       
      SC's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2015
      Location
      All over the US
      Posts
      1,688
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      19921
      Quote Originally Posted by A-Raff View Post
      Throwing in eq for less than 10 weeks you might not fully utilise it some will say. But it's still better than not using it IMO. I usually get an increased appetite after only a week. Start now, run it for 10 weeks and if your training and food is good your gonna be left with a better physique than if you didn't


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      Thanks bro!

    12. Likes A-Raff liked this post
    13. ----
    14. #6
      BOP DONATOR
      is I am back!!!
       
      I am:
      lagging
       
      Swoilder1's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2016
      Posts
      207
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      4877
      Just curious on how long later is? When are you planning to run another granted you get good labs back and go until 20 weeks?

    15. Thanks Clark Kent thanked for this post
    16. ----
    17. #7
      BOP VETERAN
      is Fantastic
       
      I am:
      Awesome
       
      SC's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2015
      Location
      All over the US
      Posts
      1,688
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      19921
      Quote Originally Posted by Swoilder1 View Post
      Just curious on how long later is? When are you planning to run another granted you get good labs back and go until 20 weeks?
      Started this cycle May 29.

    18. ----
    19. #8
      Junior Member
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Dec 2011
      Posts
      54
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      772
      Your cycle as is looks pretty good. I like proviron at more than 50mg and I have run extremely similar cycles as you are on. Eq gave me anxiety btw. Worse than tren.

    20. Thanks SC, Runfromsafety thanked for this post
      Likes SC liked this post
    21. ----
    22. #9
      BOP VETERAN
      is Fantastic
       
      I am:
      Awesome
       
      SC's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2015
      Location
      All over the US
      Posts
      1,688
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      19921
      Quote Originally Posted by shred81 View Post
      Your cycle as is looks pretty good. I like proviron at more than 50mg and I have run extremely similar cycles as you are on. Eq gave me anxiety btw. Worse than tren.
      Thanks bro.

      EQ gave you anxiety? Dang, that's no fun. So far no anxiety from the Tren, and it's been long enough that hopefully nothing crazy pops up.

      I did decide to go ahead and start the EQ at 600/wk. (should've updated the thread. My bad) I'm looking forward to the potential increase in appetite, as mine has slowly faded on this run. I'll try to remember to update this thread in a while when I notice the EQ kicking in. No guarantees though, haha.

    23. ----
    24. #10
      Junior Member
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Jun 2016
      Posts
      27
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      631
      I have always wanted to run it but I just never run cycles that long to reap the benefits of it. If you do then go for it.

    25. Thanks Clark Kent thanked for this post
      Likes SC liked this post
    26. ----
    Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

    Tags for this Thread

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •