-
250mg Test + 250mg Deca VS. 500mg Test
***Hypothetical***
Most people would recommend 500mg of test for a first cycle and most can make great gains for years using just that for each cycle.
BUT
If someone was to propose a cycle of 250mg test and 250mg of deca which equals the same overall mg's of anabolic compounds.....(typically) they would be told that the cycle is inferior or too low dosed to make any real gains.
We know deca is slightly more anabolic than test, so would 250mg test and 250mg deca not be superior to just 500mg of test alone?
Hoping someone might have some literature on this or at least an experienced opinion.
----
-
Your theory is correct and is the reason why people get bigger benefits from stacking compounds in stead of running high doses of one. The key point here that your missing in your example is you're using to low doses. 250mg of test and Deca are SLIGHTLY above theraputic levels so will only offer minimal results.
Now if you take someone who wants to use 1000mg/week of test - they would see a bigger benefit using 500mg/week of test and 400mg/week of Deca (even more of a benefit using 400mg/week of NPP) and would see even better results on 250mg/week of test and 350mg of Tren and 400mg/week of EQ.
It's NOT about total amount of MG injected/week. IMHO It's about using the least amount of compounds that will work to accomplish the results and stacking couplounds with others that are synergistic.
This game isn't for everyone, being big and bloated doesn't make you the man, nor does being 110lbs ripped. If you are not competing, find a happy medium. I was thin once, learned all there was to learn about steroids and got pretty big. Then learned how to eat and I got really huge.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
OPS liked this post
----
-
I agree with this wholeheartedly and in fact im running a moderate cycle right now in which ive already put on 16 pounds in 3 weeks. This is true in some respects though, I believe. There is a synergy to be found between certain compounds at certain dosages and can a lot of times be totally user dependant. 200/200 test/deca is a greatly synergistic combo. There is something to this ratio ive found. I do not agree that simply adding another compound will make the cycle more effective. I was all about tren up until recently when I found my strength was through the roof, but my size wasnt increasing as I wouldve liked. For me, and this is just my experience, sometimes the simplest things work best.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
OPS liked this post
----
-
In my opinion the low test/ deca cycle would be better. But if we are talking about recommending a first cycle for someone I would never recommend deca as a first cycle. Before I started trt deca always made my pct more difficult as opposed to straight test.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
This is why I think that people who are not on TRT should use NPP instead of Deca!
Originally Posted by
bdad
In my opinion the low test/ deca cycle would be better. But if we are talking about recommending a first cycle for someone I would never recommend deca as a first cycle. Before I started trt deca always made my pct more difficult as opposed to straight test.
This game isn't for everyone, being big and bloated doesn't make you the man, nor does being 110lbs ripped. If you are not competing, find a happy medium. I was thin once, learned all there was to learn about steroids and got pretty big. Then learned how to eat and I got really huge.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Currently running 600 test 400 deca. I am about two months in. The results have been staggering. I have had to actually decrease caloric intake as my size was getting a little out of hand. Jumped from 300 to 330 like it was nothing. Im 6'6 and it looks ok on me, but I really dont want too much more weight. Adding the deca made a huge difference to a test only cycle.
----
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks