Thread: compounds year round

Originally Posted by PilaS

Hello,i am thinking on do a eq cycle for 16-20 weeks with 400-600 mg of eq and then drop the dosage to 200 mg year round and maintain that dosage year round.

and eq vs primo at 200 of dosage,for year round what do you preffer

I wouldn't want to either by itself. At least run some low test if it was me. And I would definitely pick Primo to go year-round. Just my opinion

Originally Posted by PAiN

EQ only?

100 test e per week 200 eq week year round.

my mate of gym is doing this with this dosages and he is fucking huge,no more gear,only this and around 6000 clean kcals


What do you think gives better look eq or primobolan.i think with eq more vascularity and hardness.

And other thing that i dont understand,is the eq that make u dont gain fat at longer run or what?he is doing high carb high prot low fat but he eats until failure,only clean food,and he is 8% bodyfat... the true is that on cycle i was eating the same way and i didnt put fat on test cycle but were using higher dosages


And imagine i do this with eq or primo year round and you reach your maximun genetic muscular potential.
at this time will be better lower the dosage to 100 per week?you will not continue make gains,then only use for hardness and the vascularity at this point ant for lower risk of the dosage year round.I dont know if at this point with low dosage like 50-100 mg per week eq do the trick ,200 yes like my mate

Arnold loved Primo! enough said?

Originally Posted by PilaS

100 test e per week 200 eq week year round.

my mate of gym is doing this with this dosages and he is fucking huge,no more gear,only this and around 6000 clean kcals


What do you think gives better look eq or primobolan.i think with eq more vascularity and hardness.

And other thing that i dont understand,is the eq that make u dont gain fat at longer run or what?he is doing high carb high prot low fat but he eats until failure,only clean food,and he is 8% bodyfat... the true is that on cycle i was eating the same way and i didnt put fat on test cycle but were using higher dosages


And imagine i do this with eq or primo year round and you reach your maximun genetic muscular potential.
at this time will be better lower the dosage to 100 per week?you will not continue make gains,then only use for hardness and the vascularity at this point ant for lower risk of the dosage year round.I dont know if at this point with low dosage like 50-100 mg per week eq do the trick ,200 yes like my mate

I personally wouldn't do EQ alone, or with such a low dose of test year round. I've run EQ as a standalone many years ago and felt like crap. Felt great at first, but after several weeks I just starting feeling more lethargic with low libido. I added test... problem solved. If you're going to run something at a low dose year round, I would suggest hoping on TRT.

If you're wanting to add these particular compounds together, you can run test and EQ for some great gains, but I would keep my test dosage a little higher than the EQ. Test and primo would be great in which case you could even keep the primo a little higher than the test if you prefer due to the high androgenic activity of the primobolan.