Thread: Primo with EQ Synergistic or Competing for the Same Receptors?

I have heard so many mixed thoughts on whether Primo with EQ is very synergistic where you can actually take less of each together or whether EQ competes for the same receptors as Primo and you are sacrificing your Primo. I have more experience with EQ as it has always been part of the mix with Test for me - 600-800 mg (no more or I turn into a basket case with EQ anxiety) - I like it for nutrition partitioning, vascularity and increased appetite. As I get older, I want to include Primo with my low dosage test - blast and cruise model. Primo I am not sure if I have had true Primo before just like I haven't had true IGF 1 before I tried a sponsor on BOP.

I am looking for lean muscle gains - at 9% body fat now (52 years old, 5'10, 190 lbs) - I just want to get to the upper 190s and drop to 8% body fat. I have never run them together before.

I am trying to decide if with my blast of - Test E, IGF 1 and HGH - whether I should go with 800 mg of Primo or 500 mg of EQ with 500 mg of Primo (this is assuming they are synergistic knowing that on their own you need a minimum of 600 mg).

Any input or opinions from guys who have used both either together or separately would be appreciated as my ADD has kicked in full gear and I change my mind every hour especially since I found that a sponsor on this site has Boldenone Ace.

As we discussed. Zeus, they are both DHB's and EQ has a stronger affinity for the receptor than Primo so it will reduce the impact of the Primo, i.e. wasting an incredibly expensive compound. Additionally, the main benefit of EQ is the assistance with increase your appetite and the primary benefit of Primo is increase LM while on a caloric restriction, two opposing purposes. For your goals I would highly recommend the 800mgs of Primo and save the EQ.

Real synergy comes from taking different classes of compounds together to elicit higher gains, such as test+nor+dht+dhb+hgh+slin, etc. not dhb+dhb+dhb. You are reducing the potential benefits with the latter approach. The only time it makes sense to stack more than one compound of the same class is to reduce negative sides, IMHO. Yes, some gains will be increased too but primarily this is to reduce the negatives.