Muscle growth at injection site poll

[Jimring]

Sometimes studies results run counter to our personal experiences or what we believe are our personal experiences.

For.example I for one don't care what studies say regarding muscle growth at injection sites, after several dozen cycles spanning several decades I personally believe that working out a muscle group while doing injections in that group. Will yield better gains in the injected area than working out that group but injecting into another muscle or muscle group.

What do you think? I know this has been discussed and argued ad nauseum but am still curious how the subject would do here in a poll

working out a muscle group while doing injections in that group yields better gains in the injected area than working out that group but injecting into another muscle or muscle group

Or

Where you inject has no relation to muscle growth as long as it is absorbed at the same rate

[bobhead]

I think it's an indirect effect.

[babybull34]

Minimal swelling from injection, gone in days. Nothing permanent.

Unless your shooting with synthol but that's just going to move and flow with gravity and form bumps etc. anyway. So not real muscle growth.

Short answer, no.

[2Times]

No matter where I stick it, it's my stomach that grows quickest.

[Btheman]

I don’t believe there is any direct connection to injection sites and muscle growth.

[Thor I Am]

I don’t believe there is any direct connection to injection sites and muscle growth.

same thought here

[Gmanzx11]

If this was true my ass would look like Nicki Minaj.

[itsme]

yea i should have more well developed ass.. and my quads should be fukn huge

Sent from my SM-G360P using Tapatalk

[babybull34]

If this was true my ass would look like Nicki Minaj.

lol. Nice!

[350zsidewayzz]

yeah just swelling for me