Steroid Ranking chart

**BadGas** · 03-04-2019, 11:55 AM

Originally Posted by Micki420

I like this chart.
halo gives more strength gains than 4.5 tho lol

Totally agree with you.. Def should be no less than 6.

I couldn't believe how much it increased my strength .. Normally don't associate cutting products with such big strength gains..
I haven't run it since mid 90s.. I bought in Mexico when you could get Stenox tablets for dirt cheap.. at 2.5mg tablets..
I'd pop 4 non workout days. 8 on workout days.. (which was reckless) .. Don't need a lot of this compound for great results.

**Posiden** · 03-04-2019, 09:24 AM

hmmm

**Swag** · 03-14-2019, 05:31 PM

Great info.

**Sachie** · 03-14-2019, 05:45 PM

Awesome info!

**Lukas** · 03-14-2019, 08:28 PM

Why does Anavar have nothing on fat burning... Its great for cutting those last extra lbs

**Topper1** · 03-17-2019, 08:12 PM

A very helpful list, will review when I run my 1st cycle.

Thanks!

**CrimeOne** · 03-19-2019, 11:33 PM

What’s up with half of these sponsors. There all bullshit, uz check out these sponsors on just let whoever join in

**Kdavis0069** · 04-07-2019, 04:21 AM

Originally Posted by CrimeOne

What’s up with half of these sponsors. There all bullshit, uz check out these sponsors on just let whoever join in

How about you make a post in the new member section and introduce yourself. Goes farther than spouting out BS about our sponsors. Especially when it's your first post.

**Sachie** · 03-28-2019, 05:13 PM

bump

**Tribulus** · 04-15-2019, 11:12 AM

Given the anabolic and androgenic rating of these compounds are pretty much scientifically measured and studied - why is this "chart" conflicting with all that evidence? Like anavar is known for having a really great anabolic rating, and especially a good rating in the ratio between anabolic effects and androgenic effects. Yet anavar is given less for its anabolic strength with muscle growth than known far weaker anabolic compounds like primobolan or masteron.

Where did these numbers come from? On what basis does it try to justify itself as being significantly different to what the combined weight of studies has shown us about these compounds?