Originally Posted by
unclemoney
Good question... I'm about to order more, I've tried both localized and just regular sub-q systemically, couldn't tell much of a difference between the two... but being that bpc has a much shorter half life than tb I could see why it might make sense to run/inject it local as why not have it concentrated at the actual site... though of course eventually once the blood stream picks it up it does go systemic, I'd think that doing local still will give a touch more benefit but to what degree might be arguable... I've read anecdotal reports supporting both sides so really you just have to experiment for yourself... I tried it both ways and couldn't really give a definitive conclusion. I mean I believe it works regardless of where injected, just can't say if localized is that much better, but there's lots of reports that support both sides. Also... who's to say that those who reported good notes from doing sub-q may not have even benefited further from doing localized? So it's hard to say! My vote would go towards localized being a touch better, because you have a large pool that is right there, the rest of the body might get it dispersed but the large volume amount will be right where you put it and nowhere else will get that volume.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks