lol, no apology necessary
Text has a way of making things sound different than face 2 face would, perception is reality and we're just having a conversation as far as I'm concerned. Nothing harsh going on here man.
My philosophy is not the only way, it's my way and so far it works for me with excellent results. I have been the route of asking around, it isn't good enough for me. I have been burned once, I trashed 400+ml in one fail swoop, from listening to "trusted individuals that had my best intentions in mind and to give me the best advice, except it wasn't"
Quality sources are eager and proud to speak about what sets them apart. The ones I use are happy to provide labs, spectrometer tests, a ton of reviews, a strong following, detailed logs, their experience, pics of people after cycles, etc... after all that, there are still no 100% guarantees but the odds are now stacked in your favor big time and you are informed from the horses mouth, let your gut tell lead you from there.
"Good guys pointing you in the right direction, Overfilled jugs, Cheap Prices, TA times and being a great guy via internet posts" on their own merit do not qualify a source for me. Case and point: any body can be that, look what just happened here. However, those things are fantastic in addition to the other things I mention, but do not warrant a purchase, imo. You may consider that's why you've been
"burned, received short packs, under dosed gear, total bunk shit and completely robbed" a number of times per your last post.
We contact sources for 1 reason to develop a mutual respected B2B relationship. They want cash, we want good gear. Our relationship doesn't exist without this fundamental fact. It is based on what we both deem profitable, aka it has to be a win/win for it to work for each party involved. So in short, you and I can agree to disagree, that's ok. It is all a risk, to be evaluated by each individual anyway.
Bookmarks