Pheraplex/Desoxymethyltestosterone/Madol

[FREEKSHOW]

Desoxymethyltestosterone

• Androgenic 187
• Anabolic 1,200
• Standard Methyltestosterone (oraI)
• Chemical Names 17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-5a-androst-2-ene
• Estrogenic Activity - none
• Progestational Activity - no data available

Madol (desoxymethyltestosterone; also known as DMT) is a potent synthetic oral anabolic steroid, first patented in 1961 by Max Huffman of the Lasdon Foundation115. This agent was never made available as a commercial prescription drug product, and saw only limited investigation in the mid-1960's before disappearing into research obscurity. Madol remained hidden in the library bookshelves for decades, until remerging in 2005 as a new "designer steroid"of interest to international sports doping officials. This was due to the confiscation of a sample of DMT at the Canadian border in December of 2003, where it was found in the possession of Canadian sprinter Derek Dueck during a routine vehicle inspection. The DMT sample remained nameless in a Customs warehouse for over a year, until officials from the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) finally became involved and had it tested and identified. Madol is only the third never commercially marketed anabolic steroid found to be in use by athletes, following norbolethone andTHG.

Structurally, desoxymethyltestosterone is a very unique compound. Its name might imply it is a derívate of methyltestosterone, and perhaps in a way it is. The association between the two steroids, however, is very loose,for certain.The very different thing about DMT is that it is structurally a 2-ene compound, lacking the 3-keto group present on nearly all commercial anabolic steroids. This lack of a 3-keto group, however, does not mean Madol is a weak compound. Quite the contrary, Madol is an exceedingly potent oral steroid. According to the standard rat assays, Madol exceeds methyltestosterone in oral potency by a factor of 12116. At the same time, its androgenicity is recorded to be only 87% higher than methyltestosterone, giving Madol an extremely favorable anabolic to androgenic ratio (measured to be nearly 6.5:1). The resulting steroid is considerably different than methyltestosterone, a drug which is both significantly weaker mg for mg than Madol,and possesses a much more formidable androgenic component.

Unlike its distant cousin methyltestosterone, Madol is unable to convert to estrogen. This means that its use should not impart the normal estrogenic side effects such as increased water retention, fat buildup, or gynecomastia. This makes it an excellent agent to use during lean tissue building cycles, having an effect somewhat along the lines of Winstrol or trenbolone. It can also be used in bulking cycles. It is neither estrogenic nor significantly androgenic, however, and therefore not going to provide the same sheer-mass-building benefits that an injectable testosterone would. In general, we can say that Madol is functionally far removed from its cousin methyltestosterone, which is known for being a problematic side-effect-producing mass builder and a terrible agent to use during cutting cycles. The one principle side effect it does share with methyltestosterone, however, its hepatotoxicity. One should respect this agent in this regard, and be conservative with its dosage and duration of use as one would any other c-17 alpha alkylated oral.

Although Madol was never sold as a commercial prescription anabolic steroid, it did appear on the sports nutrition market in 2005 under the brand name ErgoMax LMG (Lean Mass Generator). The compound has subsequently appeared under other brand names, as its popularity and true identity spread among consumers (and other companies decided to cash in on them). This drug is sort of in a grey area legally. It is not yet listed on any State or Federal law as an anabolic steroid, and therefore is not subject to criminal possession laws (you can't get busted for owning or using DMT). But at the same time, it is clearly synthetic in nature, and therefore not quite legal to sell as a dietary supplement. At the time of writing this, the FDA has acknowledged the presence of DMT in the supplement market, and is in the process of evaluating and removing such products from commerce.

Manufacture of this unique steroid is not extremely easy. The first hints of this came from the World Anti-Doping Agency, who reported that the confiscated sample of DMT was shown to be very impure upon analysis. It was principally comprised of four different steroidal components, DMT, its unmethylated analog, and isomers of these two steroids bearing a 3-ene structure instead of 2-ene. DMT is likely the only effective anabolic steroid in the group, making it obvious the blend is an issue of manufacturing contamination and not functionality. The same issue appeared again when Don Catlin and his staff at the UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory began working on methods for detecting DMT in urine. The procedure required they obtained samples of DMT to work with, which was accomplished by chemically modifying the available starting material 5-alpha-androst-2-ene-17-one. Even the laboratory material they had to work with was shown to be a mixture of both 2-ene and 3-ene isomers (in approximately a 4:1 ratio) upon analysis, and unexpected but now obviously consistent result. It is unknown if any pure DMT product has been produced to date, so the same purity issues are likely to appear in other (perhaps all) DMT-containing products.

An effective oral daily dosage for Madol would fall in the range of 5-15mg (males). Given that purity of this material seems to remain an issue, this could relate to as much as 10-30mg per day (or more) of any product containing DMT. Some may be tempted to go higher than this in dosage, but should keep in mind the liver toxicity of the agent (and at the very least plan for regular blood tests). This steroid is also very versatile one, and will stack well with a variety of other compounds for either cutting or bulking purposes. Health conscious individuals will want to stick with non-alkylated injectable compounds, so that overall hepatotoxicity is minimized. For mass, this could mean stacking 10mg daily with 200-600mg weekly of an injectable testosterone. Deca-Durabolin or Equipoise can alternately be used for more muscle definition. Here, a six week run combining 400mg per week of nandrolone or boldenone ester with lOmg daily of DMT should impart significant tissue gains without excessive androgenic or estrogenic side effects. It is of note that this steroid is mild enough to be used by women, although the dosage should be much smaller (only 1-2mg per day). Still, it is a potent steroid, and as such there is no guarantee virilizing side effects will not occur.
__________________

[GoProp]

interesting!! Can this be gotten from any of our sponsors?? or onli e somewhere??

[stupes]

I have not found Phera Plex out there at all. It's my favorite oral of all-time. Sponsors carry superdrol - but no phera plex. I think it would be a big seller if a UGL started supplying it.

[Dont wanna be old]

I doubt the raw powder is available .
I wouldn't trust someone selling something that doesn't exist any longer .
Scammers already sell Primobolan that tested as EQ .
Sure you got gains and think it's a hormone .
Stick with the basics and you won't go wrong .

[stupes]

A raw supplier would need to synthesize it - I know of one that would do it but they would only produce a 5KG minimum batch. It was originally synthesized by Patrick Arnold and used by BALCO clients - then it was very widely produced and sold on the US "supplement" market prior to it's ban in 2009. So Chinese suppliers are more than capable of producing it - if there is a market.

Checking on the price for 5KG for sake of curiosity. Maybe it's cost prohibitive for one UGL to make the market - don't know.

[wsnake]

Pheraplex hasn't been made for years.

[Leotis]

Sure sounds nice though!

[aussieraven]

I'd still go for superdrol if anything to do with DS

[cominback22]

Really wish a UGL would bring this back. I know most traditional AAS user will turn their nose up at this, but I strongly believe there is a place for these compounds in our interest. Personally Phera treats me better than dbol ever has. Equally producing mass with much less bloat. And one of the best euphoria feeling drugs there is IMO.

[gravy]

Phera is awesome. If it was only released as a aas it would of been popular as but because it was released under the PH banner the traditional guys won't give it a go. There has to be UGL's still making it you would think