Thread: New cycle advice

Originally Posted by Ragnor

The only thing I see wrong with that is how much more anabolic than EQ is.Its a pretty big difference.It is with all AAS but EQ is more unique as it's a Veterinarian product.Just on paper don't look as beneficial.Like Tren is different it's anabolic ratio is 100:500 and Test is 100:100 so Tren is way more anabolic.Idk on paper when you study EQ and know it's effects just don't seem beneficial to do.But you can always try and see.Just because on paper don't look beneficial doesn't mean it won't work for your goals.

VIKING KING

I agree on paper it doesn't look that good but I know personally that EQ works great for me especially at 600 mg or above. What would you suggest raising the test up a little bit and if so how much?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by bigmills

I agree on paper it doesn't look that good but I know personally that EQ works great for me especially at 600 mg or above. What would you suggest raising the test up a little bit and if so how much?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Just 100mgs of Cyp and 100mgs und would be good.600mgs Test and 600mg EQ.

VIKING KING