Anabolic to androgenic ratios

[af86]

Here are the anabolic/androgenic ratios of the most common steroids.

Anadrol 50: Androgenic: Anabolic Ratio: 45:320

Anavar: Anabolic/Androgenic Ratio (Range): 322-630:24

Androil: Anabolic/Androgenic Ratio (Range): 100:100

Andropen 275: Anabolic/Androgenic Ratio (Range):100:100

Deca-Durabolin: Anabolic/Androgenic ratio: 125:37

Dianabol: Anabolic/Androgenic Ratio (Range): 90-210:40-60

Equipoise: Anabolic/ Androgenic ratio: 100:50

Halotestin: Anabolic/Androgenic ratio:1,900/850

Masteron: Anabolic/Androgenic Ratio:62:25

NPP: Androgenic/Anabolic ratio: 37:125

Omnadren: Anabolic/Androgenic Ratio: 100:100

Oral Turnibol: Anabolic/ Androgenic ratio: >100:>0

Parabolan (Tren): Anabolic/Androgenic ratio: 500/500

Primobolan: Anabolic/Androgenic Ratio (Range): 88:44-57

Proviron: Androgenic: Anabolic Ratio:30-40/100-150

Sustanon 250: Anabolic/Androgenic ratio:100/100

Testosterone Cyp, Enanthate, Prop, Suspension Anabolic/Androgenic ratio:100/100

Winstrol: Androgenic/Anabolic Ratio:30:320

I found this informational for designing a cycle.


Hypodermic

[cb1]

Looking at these numbers primo is very disapointing. Not worth the extra cost when most common cheaper anabolics have better numbers. Winny looks slightly beter than anadrol. Very interesting. I know that whats on paper doesnt always translate into real world results.

[Bendit]

I think I've got a grasp on the ratio but how do those numbers plug into a stack, go for balance? , higher one way or the other depending on goal bulk or cut

[daveblacktown]

This might surprise some:

Anabolic/Androgeneric Ratings
OTC Designers ~ Traditional orals
M1T: 900-1600 / Anadrol: 320
Superdrol: 400 / Dianabol: 90-210
Pheraplex: 160 / Methyltestosterone: 100
Dimethazine: 200 / Winstrol: 320
Epistane: 1100 / Anavar: 322-630

Check out some more info from Henryv: http://supplementreviews.com/forum/index.php?topic=20458.15

[TheTrain]

I LOVE m1T!!! sides are rough on me. May need to look and see if anyone has some:) Thanks for the post AF

[Khem]

There are a lot of things that on paper look good, but they weren't medically approved and used literally only because the medical field wants well tolerated, low side effect occurrence steroids. So while you may find stronger, it may be extremely hepatoxic, or give you a lot of undesirable side effects.

[IRISHOAK]

Interesting. Good info.

[Gramps]

Thanks for digging that up.
although, not sure about how alot of that actually translates in the human body.
those studies were done a long time ago.
half weren't even done on actual human test subjects and conclusions were made a little prematurely.
its obvious just looking at some of these that they simply aren't real world specs.
also if I'm not mistaken...this is mg for mg?
some steroids are taken at 3 mg per week others at grams...so its all relative yeah?

[Dbolish]

the studies were done on rats and have very little real world word application. tren is strong, but 5x stronger than tren? no chance

[lipid]

good in theory, however in real world application from my experience doesnt work out this way.