PDA

View Full Version : best Igf-1 lr3



bigtruckguy
08-24-2014, 02:45 PM
Sup bros just trying to locate the best source for some igf... I have heard a lot how most places have bunk igf so if you have had any good igf please let me know.. I have seen it through our sources available here ranging from $40 to $70 but would just like to know if anyone had had any good results...

Dont wanna be old
08-24-2014, 03:38 PM
If anyone sold any bunk products they wouldn't be on BOP .
Our reputation is tied to our sponsors .
With that being said I would look at there reviews .
Some prices are reflective of amount of peptide . I payed more for TB500 thinking it was 2mg/vial as most are . Received and vials had 5mg .
Sales vary and prices are confusing .
If you can't find reviews to your satisfaction then look at there reps who offer tons of great articles .
Good luck and enjoy never ending research .
DWBO

FrankTheTank
08-24-2014, 04:52 PM
From everything I've read and seen it is very hard to get REAL igf-1

I used some called Ripnovous a couple years ago, it was great. They say take it prework out and if you don't get the craziest pumps you've ever had then its probably fake.

NeverOnce
08-24-2014, 06:26 PM
I've yet to try our sponsors here. Can I source a non sponsor?

actually in looking at the list here. I've tried bluesky and everything seems legit. I'm currently using another brand but I saw results with bluesky igf1-lr3

animal87
08-24-2014, 06:45 PM
In all honesty you would be better off just running growth peps or good gh. Igf is hard to find, expensive and you cant take it very long before it stops working.

NeverOnce
08-24-2014, 07:05 PM
This kind of confuses me because there are tons of studies on igf-1 and it works for sure. Personally I feel igf-1 its a good value. Real GH is outrageous. igf-1 Works fast, weeks rather than months. I think you can run 5 weeks on 2 weeks off or 50 days on 20-40 days off something like that. Also its everywhere. Is it really faked most of the time?

Another thing, people say sub q is the way to go and IM site injections don't do anything because of the half life of lr3 and it circulating or whatever. I pinned it in my right shoulder to heal injury and I watched it out grow the other with no training.

NeverOnce
08-24-2014, 07:57 PM
Damn, this has really got me questioning things

Jimmyinkedup
08-24-2014, 08:16 PM
You have to make sure the igf you get is recombinant dna synthesized, and that isnt cheap. I ony know of one peptide manufacturer that openly states their applicable peps are recombinant dna synthesized and I use them for all my peptides. They are also US made peptides as well. Yeah they cost more but they are always legit so its worth it.

Hatefactory
08-24-2014, 10:51 PM
Sup bros just trying to locate the best source for some igf... I have heard a lot how most places have bunk igf so if you have had any good igf please let me know.. I have seen it through our sources available here ranging from $40 to $70 but would just like to know if anyone had had any good results...

I'm taking evolution peptides igf lr3 right now and definitely gotten some decent pumps considering I'm off cycle. I have some from true peptide coming in soon so I will let you know how that goes

bigtruckguy
08-25-2014, 01:25 AM
I usually use elite peptides for everything I get and I am in no way saying our sources are selling bunk gear.. just heard that true igf like jimmyinkedup was saying is hard to find and cost a lot more...

FrankTheTank
08-25-2014, 03:47 AM
If I knew the IGF was legit, I would run it over HGH. We take HGH to get our igf-1 levels to raise so taking igf skips the middle man. Rich Piana has some good videos on youtube explaining his take on it and it makes a ton of sense.

animal87
08-25-2014, 04:14 AM
If it was cheap and readily available igf and hgh and tren would be the wonder stack. You get desynthesized to igf fairly quick and need to cycle on and off, but if you ran gh with it you be be fine with that. Tren raises igf as well.

NeverOnce
08-25-2014, 06:09 AM
So is anyone going to drop a solid source

BLUELABEL
08-25-2014, 02:27 PM
it really is all pretty cheap each works out to like a couple dollars a day... unless you over eat your hgh young man lol na but for real its cheaper then a breakfast sandwich everyday and a coffee

tyga
08-26-2014, 01:28 PM
ive used our LR3 but not our DES. Used LR3 during my first prep..

we've got a few discounts running

nspaletta
08-27-2014, 05:35 PM
Inclrelex and ipsan I believe is the other one are the only 2 igf-1 peptides I would 100% trust. but the price you pay is quite a bit (40mg for $1600 is the average cost). There are research companies that do have some pretty good igf lr3 and des peptides as well but as jimmyinkedup posted you have to do your homework and make sure they are us peptides and synthesized correctly.

animal87
09-16-2014, 06:12 PM
I remembered these threads. I've been running some igf, I'm not going to say what sponser. I still feel the same as before, I think its underdosed. I'm getting strange pumps, but not mind blowing or painful. I worked my back today and I like to reach up really far on lat pulldowns/highrows and get a really good lat strech. I got pumps quick in my biceps which is unusual for me on those and got a little pump in my tricep from extending my arms all the way up. I noticed I was more vascular than usual right after I pinned it and during the workout as well.

Blergs
09-16-2014, 06:22 PM
Sup bros just trying to locate the best source for some igf... I have heard a lot how most places have bunk igf so if you have had any good igf please let me know.. I have seen it through our sources available here ranging from $40 to $70 but would just like to know if anyone had had any good results...

not as simple as bunk or not, some places are not really sure what they are doing...
here is info I made n posted at another place that might help, I only use 2 places now for years. I agree there is alot of BS out there, anyway here is info, and i have few more threads like it if peopl are interested ill post up:

Why peptides you use should be from a recombinant DNA source and not a chemically synthesized source

I want to bring something up about peptides and peptide quality. I see many people going the cheap route but there is a reason that they may be simply wasting their money. That is why I wanted to start a thread about an issue I think is going on related to efficacy of chemically synthesized IGF and most other peptides vs. recombinantly made ones.

There are many threads on here about IGF-1 and other peps giving good gains and I feel some of it may be BS or the person is having a "placebo affect", while others swear peptides are a complete scam and do nothing at all! (not true)... There might be a reason your igf1 cycle didn't give you jack shit?

Why?

I believe most are purchasing IGF-1 (for an example of a popular peptide being used) made by cheap peptide synthesis companies. However, chemical synthesis of IGF-1 lacks the correct disulfide bonds that cause the proper folding and function in the peptide chain. IGF-1 and its many analogs require 3 disulfide bonds to generate the correct folded form of the protein and this can only be accomplished in the body as naturally produced, or in E.coli bacteria as a recombinant source which is similar to how HGH is made (recombinantly).

Insulin is also very similar to the structure of IGF-1 and it also is inactive and/or unstable if synthesized chemically, it has to be made recombinantly or extracted from a biologic source (they used to extract insulin from bovine and HGH from cadavers).
Made with "recombinant DNA" means it is made in bacteria which have data input into it and "fermented" create enzymes that make these intramolecular disulfide bonds so that the protein folds into the right configuration and has the biological function it is supposed to have, having the proper amino chain is NOT enough and it is NOT that simple!

If you look into human clinical trials or current clinical treatment of patients, they now use some of these peptides as part of a therapy protocol and they use recombinant DNA made peptides, not chemically synthesized ones and for good reason.

Here is just one of many studies on how important the correct bonds are, not just the structure>
Role of native disulfide bonds in the structure... [Biochemistry. 1993] - PubMed - NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8494898) > Role of native disulfide bonds in the structure... [Biochemistry. 1993] - PubMed - NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8494898)


There are many cheap peptide sellers popping out like CRAZY the last couple years with ridiculously low prices that just doesn't make any sense. So I say if it seems too good to be true, then it probably is!
There is a reason some places are so cheap while others can cost more than 2X or 3X the amount of the cheaper places.

You usually get what you pay for so PLEASE do your research first!

Just because it's pricy doesn't automatically mean its top quality, you still need to research the company.
But if it is really cheap then I would just avoid it because the chances of it being properly made are minimal in this case. IMO

There is a flood of shotty quality peptides coming from china, BE SAFE AND AVOID!

What you want is the more expensive recombinant DNA made peptides! NOT the cheaply made, unstable and largely biologically inactive chemically synthesized peptides!

Many don't even have a clue about all this and that is why I am posting this thread.

Hope it helps someone!


Cheers

Hatefactory
09-16-2014, 08:17 PM
not as simple as bunk or not, some places are not really sure what they are doing...
here is info I made n posted at another place that might help, I only use 2 places now for years. I agree there is alot of BS out there, anyway here is info, and i have few more threads like it if peopl are interested ill post up:

Why peptides you use should be from a recombinant DNA source and not a chemically synthesized source

I want to bring something up about peptides and peptide quality. I see many people going the cheap route but there is a reason that they may be simply wasting their money. That is why I wanted to start a thread about an issue I think is going on related to efficacy of chemically synthesized IGF and most other peptides vs. recombinantly made ones.

There are many threads on here about IGF-1 and other peps giving good gains and I feel some of it may be BS or the person is having a "placebo affect", while others swear peptides are a complete scam and do nothing at all! (not true)... There might be a reason your igf1 cycle didn't give you jack shit?

Why?

I believe most are purchasing IGF-1 (for an example of a popular peptide being used) made by cheap peptide synthesis companies. However, chemical synthesis of IGF-1 lacks the correct disulfide bonds that cause the proper folding and function in the peptide chain. IGF-1 and its many analogs require 3 disulfide bonds to generate the correct folded form of the protein and this can only be accomplished in the body as naturally produced, or in E.coli bacteria as a recombinant source which is similar to how HGH is made (recombinantly).

Insulin is also very similar to the structure of IGF-1 and it also is inactive and/or unstable if synthesized chemically, it has to be made recombinantly or extracted from a biologic source (they used to extract insulin from bovine and HGH from cadavers).
Made with "recombinant DNA" means it is made in bacteria which have data input into it and "fermented" create enzymes that make these intramolecular disulfide bonds so that the protein folds into the right configuration and has the biological function it is supposed to have, having the proper amino chain is NOT enough and it is NOT that simple!

If you look into human clinical trials or current clinical treatment of patients, they now use some of these peptides as part of a therapy protocol and they use recombinant DNA made peptides, not chemically synthesized ones and for good reason.

Here is just one of many studies on how important the correct bonds are, not just the structure>
Role of native disulfide bonds in the structure... [Biochemistry. 1993] - PubMed - NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8494898) > Role of native disulfide bonds in the structure... [Biochemistry. 1993] - PubMed - NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8494898)


There are many cheap peptide sellers popping out like CRAZY the last couple years with ridiculously low prices that just doesn't make any sense. So I say if it seems too good to be true, then it probably is!
There is a reason some places are so cheap while others can cost more than 2X or 3X the amount of the cheaper places.

You usually get what you pay for so PLEASE do your research first!

Just because it's pricy doesn't automatically mean its top quality, you still need to research the company.
But if it is really cheap then I would just avoid it because the chances of it being properly made are minimal in this case. IMO

There is a flood of shotty quality peptides coming from china, BE SAFE AND AVOID!

What you want is the more expensive recombinant DNA made peptides! NOT the cheaply made, unstable and largely biologically inactive chemically synthesized peptides!

Many don't even have a clue about all this and that is why I am posting this thread.

Hope it helps someone!


Cheers




Awesome post bro. This clears up a lot. Most people agree that real IGF is awesome but most people also agree that it is mostly faked. I have recently tried some igf myself and got some decent results but none of those crazy pumps and results you read about

ElitePeptides
09-17-2014, 02:38 PM
We have true recombinant IGF-1 LR3. Very rare to find this stuff at the right quality.

Hatefactory
09-17-2014, 02:41 PM
We have true recombinant IGF-1 LR3. Very rare to find this stuff at the right quality.

Good to know!

bigtruckguy
09-21-2014, 05:43 AM
We have true recombinant IGF-1 LR3. Very rare to find this stuff at the right quality.
don't know how I lost track of this thread but I have always used elite for my peptides and haven't been disappointed yet. next purchase will be some igf so we will see how it does... throw up a good special on it lol

Hatefactory
09-21-2014, 01:31 PM
don't know how I lost track of this thread but I have always used elite for my peptides and haven't been disappointed yet. next purchase will be some igf so we will see how it does... throw up a good special on it lol

Be sure to let us know how it is bro!

bigtruckguy
09-21-2014, 02:00 PM
will do bro

bigtruckguy
09-26-2014, 04:17 AM
Hey Elite when will yall throw up a bogo on igf lol

dorianyates
10-04-2014, 03:26 PM
Hey Elite when will yall throw up a bogo on igf lol
yea i am looking for some LEGIT tested
igf-1 lr3 recombinant DNA...

nidnoy
01-03-2015, 09:02 PM
I know this is am old bump but wondering if anyone has feedback on bluesky igf? Theirs is supposed to be recombinant but cant find any reviews. I had some great igf pre ord, but no such luck recently

happy rehal
12-09-2016, 08:11 AM
I'm taking evolution peptides igf lr3 right now and definitely gotten some decent pumps considering I'm off cycle. I have some from true peptide coming in soon so I will let you know how that goes

can u send some pictures of evolution peptide box nd vial .. here it comes in 1 mg vial .. nd box comes in 10 set of vial

happy rehal
12-09-2016, 08:13 AM
here is my wattsapp number

bigmills
02-07-2017, 03:21 AM
I would have to say the best igf out there is somodiem made by sciroxx.. I don't know if it's on this board or not but there are boards your people have done blood test and it is definitely legit.. I have to add this I cannot stand when people with refer to Rich Piana...

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk