Thread: Peptides, Tissue Growth & Protection and Practical use surrounding them

Originally Posted by Mungus

Interesting. I' be interested to hear opinions on dosing and frequency of the CJC1295/MOD-GRF, especially in combination with GHRP-2. It seems that some recommend smaller doses x3/D (100mg for instance), as opposed to the information above which suggests 1mg+ x once weekly. If the half life is 7-10 days I can see the logic, but given that GHRP-2 and CJC-1295 supposedly have a synergistic effects would a protocol such as GHRP-2 x 200mg x 3/day + CJC-1295 100mg x 3/day be more beneficial? While single larger doses may encourage the production of GH (as per above) it is also the release of GH we are trying to achieve. At 100mg x 3/day you would quickly end up with a much higher concentration available that 1mg x 1/week.

this is why i highly rec Mod GRF 1-29 or even sermorelin with ghrp over the cjc's. the active life and dosing work better. look at it almost liek using mastp and teste when you can just use testp and mastp since the dosing would be the same. but in this case i feel it is even more important since they are telling your body to do stuff. I woud opt for Mod GRF 1-29 for these reasons.

Originally Posted by Blergs

this is why i highly rec Mod GRF 1-29 or even sermorelin with ghrp over the cjc's.

Are you referring to CJC1295 W/out DAC? This is Mod GRF 29, no?

Originally Posted by Mungus

Are you referring to CJC1295 W/out DAC? This is Mod GRF 29, no?

there is no true "w/out DAC" cjc 1293 and cjc 1295 both have it. 1293 is slightly faster, but still slow. usually people miss call Mod GRF 1-29 as CJC 1293 w/o Dac. in this case you are getting something without dac, but its not CJC. I spoke with chemists before and one makes a bunch of stuff in my area out of a lab, anyway I spot to him about this because there is soo much stories that go around when it comes to cjc1295/cjc1293/mod GRF's and Dac
what you want is and should be called is: " Mod GRF (1-29) "

Thanks yes I book marked also this is great info

Originally Posted by Mungus

Are you referring to CJC1295 W/out DAC? This is Mod GRF 29, no?

cjc1295 and cjc1293 BOTH have dac, alot of places name it wrong and pretty much put sermorelin or mod GRF (1-29) as CJC without dac IMO
the 1293 is a little faster but its pretty close to the 1295. it would not be CJC without the DAC alteration/addition. atleast what I have come to from what i have spoken about with chemists from friends university (looking at bonds and peptide make up) and with my other research. the whole CJC thing and dac can be confusing and it hurts my head. so now i just speak of 1295 or straight mod GRF (1-29) or sermorelin and keep it simpler .

any info proving otherwise I am open to though.