Sponsored Links |
there is no true "w/out DAC" cjc 1293 and cjc 1295 both have it. 1293 is slightly faster, but still slow. usually people miss call Mod GRF 1-29 as CJC 1293 w/o Dac. in this case you are getting something without dac, but its not CJC. I spoke with chemists before and one makes a bunch of stuff in my area out of a lab, anyway I spot to him about this because there is soo much stories that go around when it comes to cjc1295/cjc1293/mod GRF's and Dac
what you want is and should be called is: " Mod GRF (1-29) "
Thanks yes I book marked also this is great info
cjc1295 and cjc1293 BOTH have dac, alot of places name it wrong and pretty much put sermorelin or mod GRF (1-29) as CJC without dac IMO
the 1293 is a little faster but its pretty close to the 1295. it would not be CJC without the DAC alteration/addition. atleast what I have come to from what i have spoken about with chemists from friends university (looking at bonds and peptide make up) and with my other research. the whole CJC thing and dac can be confusing and it hurts my head. so now i just speak of 1295 or straight mod GRF (1-29) or sermorelin and keep it simpler .
any info proving otherwise I am open to though.
Bookmarks