-
Add BB or not? 300mg/ml
So when making higher concentrations, such as 300mg/ml...Test E
100ml×300mg 30,000mg or 30g powder + 10% = 33g powder. Extra 10% to prevent underdose.
Now, I am reading conflicting thoughts on BB content.
Some add BB, and some say it is not needed?
I know it has to do with crashing your gear, as well as flow viscosity.
What if one wanted to lower BA to 1% or 1.5%?
Basically, trying to find the best fit for low PIP @300mg/ml....with good flow for filtering through .20
Last edited by Plate Smacker; 04-02-2017 at 05:26 PM.
"It's a lot of hard work, it's hard work that most people don't realize. I think the consistency of the hard work, is the hardest part." Dallas McCarver
----
-
BB is not needed for Test E. Ive found pip from test e comes from carbolic acid. Its used in the proccess of making the raw. So in order to get rid of it, add your test to carrier oil into beaker, put in pan of water and heat it. Get the oil and test e over 200 degrees. The boiling point of carbolic acid is 198 degrees. Let it heat for 30 minutes. Let cool, add ba, filter and enjoy. I personally would not lower the ba content. That helps perserve your solution. Ive used this proccess and made 400mg/ml of test e.never crashed and smooth as silk
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks, 3 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
no its not need i have plenty recipes without bb personally i wont go to low on the ba the last time i made some test e at 400mg i had ethyl oleate to the mix and have no pip
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
No not needed. You CAN use it. But the way u heat the hormone is really the key. I personally use 1% ba and its plenty to keep solution from growing any bacteria.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
----
Plate Smacker thanked for this post
Plate Smacker liked this post
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks