A word about a Miglyol 840.

**Enigma** · 05-23-2019, 04:34 PM

Have received a few PMs about this. I have all but stopped using this carrier except for personal blends. It has proven to be more painful than a Test prop pinning for a few people and not something I can afford regarding my reputation/products.

Here is what I recommend:

Buy a small amount of Mig from a sponsor or whatever. Using a .22 micron syringe filter, draw out a ml of plain Mig into a syringe. Swap the filter out for an appropriate needle and inject. Preferably in your glute.

Wait a week and see what happens. You will know by then if your body tolerates it.

I know more more than a few labs that started using Mig but abandoned it, as I have, due to customer sensitivity.
I have actually taken to making 3ml hgh vials of “sterile” Mig and sending it to friends to test this way. After sending a few rather expensive blends to buddies and having them cripple up from the Mig, I save the cost and hassle.

Mig IS amazing for those who can tolerate it. I have gone on record here that any amount of Test prop cripples me. Yet I made a Test prop/test e/ Deca blend at 50/200/200 and pinned my quads with zero problems.

Mig is fantastic or dreadful. Seems to be no in between.

I will answer any questions I can about anything. The caveat is the queries need to be in open forum so everyone can benefit.

Happy brewing!

**BBforDAgirls** · 05-26-2019, 03:42 AM

Ok, say someone wanted to brew test prop and opt out of using mig840 for example (bad reaction to mig). What would you recommend be a good starting point for a recipe that solution holds well with little to no pip? I know prop doesn't respond well with you but was that because it had mig840 or you react the same when it's made without mig840? I think I also understand that a blend with other compounds may mask pip all together, but what about just straight up test prop? I'm glad you let's us know more about your experience and what others have experienced with the mig840.

**Ranger15** · 05-26-2019, 04:55 AM

They oil that most big pharma uses is CSO yes it’s of a thicker viscosity but it’s also been most compatible with they masses .

**Enigma** · 05-26-2019, 05:01 PM

Sorry if I wasn’t clear...
ANY amount of normally brewed test propionate cripples me. Even the 30mg in Sustanon. Normal 100mg prop would probably kill me. (Not exactly but I’d probably wish I were dead). When I put 50mg of it in a blend with Mig as a carrier, no pip.

Back in the days when I had my own brand being distributed at local farmacias, I made a “painless” Sust250. I skipped the BB and used 30% EO. People loved the lack of usual Sust pip. I discontinued it because of the cost of EO. I still make a Sust350 using the same 30% EO/no BB recipe by adding 100mg of Cyp to the Sust blend. This bridges the gap in the short and super long undecanoate esters. Also painless.

Test prop can be made at 100mg/mg using the 2/20 standard and holds easily in solution not suspension. I actually make a 100/100/50 Prop/Mast/Tren blend for my competitors. Just use the 2/20 standard with MCT as the carrier.

A note about pharma carriers. Going through several labels on the internet, I see that CSO is used less than sesame and that many use peanut oil, which is labeled as “arachis” oil.