-
Originally Posted by
T-Bagger
When did you start testing GH again? You said not too long ago that you couldn’t accurately test it so you stopped.
Please quote me on that, because it's not true.
----
-
Originally Posted by
T-Bagger
When did you start testing GH again? You said not too long ago that you couldn’t accurately test it so you stopped.
What is your intent by posting disinformation ?
BOP staff Vetted Janoshik with tests he preformed . 2 of the samples were pulled from the same vial and Janoshik had no information on any of the vials .
Good day sir
DWBO
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
----
-
Hi Jano, question on GH testing.
Is it possible to tell difference between 191 aa and 192 aa during your testing procedures?
My other question is, would 192 aa yield similar results in our bodies, example high IGF levels and blood serum levels?
Thank you.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
1bigpapapump1
Hi Jano, question on GH testing.
Is it possible to tell difference between 191 aa and 192 aa during your testing procedures?
My other question is, would 192 aa yield similar results in our bodies, example high IGF levels and blood serum levels?
Thank you.
Hello!
Yes, the HPLC testing can clearly differentiate between 191 and 192 amino acid GH.
192 aa would cause the same exact results as 191aa, only difference would be the increased risk of side effects and complications.
I have, however, never seen 192 on the market and I have dealt with about a hundred samples up until now.
- Jano
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
janoshik
Hello!
Yes, the HPLC testing can clearly differentiate between 191 and 192 amino acid GH.
192 aa would cause the same exact results as 191aa, only difference would be the increased risk of side effects and complications.
I have, however, never seen 192 on the market and I have dealt with about a hundred samples up until now.
- Jano
Thank you for the response.
Yes sir, i have thought about the potential side effects if using 192aa, and had me thinking.
We all know there is a lot of good quality generics on the market, and with prices being quite low some times, i tend to wonder if maybe the GH was 192aa instead of 191aa. (Assuming 192aa is cheaper to produce).
I am glad to hear that at no point thus far have you seen 192aa.
Again, thanks for your response.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Always get professional and considerate service from Jano, highly recommend!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
janoshik
Please quote me on that, because it's not true.
My apologies Jano. I thought I read it but you were speaking of Simec.
----
-
Originally Posted by
T-Bagger
My apologies Jano. I thought I read it but you were speaking of Simec.
No problem.
SIMEC stopped testing GH after I helped prove that their results were bad. Pretty much all of them over the years. I got my deal of ugly words from their lab technician, before the owner came to deal with it.
Every sponsor who had GH tested with them knew that, but who would complain, when your stuff tests 30-40% better than it really is?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
h-as.pharma
Always get professional and considerate service from Jano, highly recommend!
Absolutely Jano does good work.
Ak
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Welcome jano glad to have you here brother
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
Bookmarks