Originally Posted by
Reliable_DNP
Thanks for this post. Very interesting.
Why did you describe this as "curious"? I ask because my understanding is that mere receipt of a package, without proof that the recipient ORDERED the package, is insufficient for prosecutors to obtain a conviction. Proof of order typically comes from one of two places - interrogation and/or the search warrant. In this case, it sounds like the buyer ordered and tracked his order via the clear web, without stealth, on his personal computer and phone. (Shit OPSEC, this, btw, for purhasing distribution quantities of a scheduled drug.) If that is correct, the fact that Rasmussen's PC/phone contained evidence of his order is crucial to making the case. Thoughts?
Also, any info on how customs found the drugs? Can't imagine they have a dianabol dog?!?