• Amused
  • Angry
  • Annoyed
  • ArrgPirate
  • atwork
  • Awesome
  • Bemused
  • Cocky
  • Cool
  • Crazy
  • Crying
  • deejayn
  • Depressed
  • Down
  • drinking
  • Drunk
  • eating
  • editing
  • Embarrased
  • Enraged
  • Friendly
  • gamingpc
  • gamingps
  • gamingsteam
  • gamingxbox
  • Geeky
  • Godly
  • Happy
  • hatemailing
  • Hungry
  • Innocent
  • lagging
  • livestreaming
  • loving
  • lurking
  • Meh
  • netflix
  • nostatus
  • Poorly
  • raging
  • Sad
  • Secret
  • Shy
  • Sneaky
  • Tired
  • trolling
  • Wtf
  • youtuber
  • zombies
  • Results 1 to 10 of 81

    Thread: Personal use bust.

    Hybrid View

    Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
    1. #1
      Banned
      is Hungry
       
      I am:
      nostatus
       

      Join Date
      Aug 2017
      Location
      Squat Rack
      Posts
      364
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      217
      Quote Originally Posted by Bombarinos View Post
      Curiously, federal prosecutors were careful to note that Rasmussen used his Apple MacBook to purchase steroids and used his Apple iPhone to track the shipment status via the USPS website.
      Thanks for this post. Very interesting.

      Why did you describe this as "curious"? I ask because my understanding is that mere receipt of a package, without proof that the recipient ORDERED the package, is insufficient for prosecutors to obtain a conviction. Proof of order typically comes from one of two places - interrogation and/or the search warrant. In this case, it sounds like the buyer ordered and tracked his order via the clear web, without stealth, on his personal computer and phone. (Shit OPSEC, this, btw, for purhasing distribution quantities of a scheduled drug.) If that is correct, the fact that Rasmussen's PC/phone contained evidence of his order is crucial to making the case. Thoughts?

      Also, any info on how customs found the drugs? Can't imagine they have a dianabol dog?!?

    2.    Sponsored Links

      ----
    3. #2
      Member
      is Legs and abs
       
      I am:
      zombies
       
      Snookslayer05's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2018
      Posts
      232
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      9041
      Quote Originally Posted by Reliable_DNP View Post
      Thanks for this post. Very interesting.

      Why did you describe this as "curious"? I ask because my understanding is that mere receipt of a package, without proof that the recipient ORDERED the package, is insufficient for prosecutors to obtain a conviction. Proof of order typically comes from one of two places - interrogation and/or the search warrant. In this case, it sounds like the buyer ordered and tracked his order via the clear web, without stealth, on his personal computer and phone. (Shit OPSEC, this, btw, for purhasing distribution quantities of a scheduled drug.) If that is correct, the fact that Rasmussen's PC/phone contained evidence of his order is crucial to making the case. Thoughts?

      Also, any info on how customs found the drugs? Can't imagine they have a dianabol dog?!?
      go on NETFLIX and watch border security. America’s frontline. It will scare the shit out of you ordering over seas. It’s got me so paranoid. But my friend keeps telling me I’m alright. We don’t order enough to waste their money and time on. We get small amounts at a time. Even if we wait a month to order rest. It will show them seizing steroids on that show on Netflix.
      Last edited by Snookslayer05; 08-13-2018 at 09:00 PM.
      FAST LIFE

    4. ----
    5. #3
      Senior Member
      is saing goodbye.
       
      I am:
      loving
       

      Join Date
      Jan 2018
      Posts
      2,862
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      97922
      Quote Originally Posted by Reliable_DNP View Post
      Thanks for this post. Very interesting.

      Why did you describe this as "curious"? I ask because my understanding is that mere receipt of a package, without proof that the recipient ORDERED the package, is insufficient for prosecutors to obtain a conviction. Proof of order typically comes from one of two places - interrogation and/or the search warrant. In this case, it sounds like the buyer ordered and tracked his order via the clear web, without stealth, on his personal computer and phone. (Shit OPSEC, this, btw, for purhasing distribution quantities of a scheduled drug.) If that is correct, the fact that Rasmussen's PC/phone contained evidence of his order is crucial to making the case. Thoughts?

      Also, any info on how customs found the drugs? Can't imagine they have a dianabol dog?!?
      A prosecutor can charge you for no reason.
      Never forget that.
      Suspicion...

    6. Likes WILDGAME liked this post
    7. ----
    8. #4
      Member
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       
      WILDGAME's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 2018
      Posts
      334
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      1221
      Quote Originally Posted by born View Post
      A prosecutor can charge you for no reason.
      Never forget that.
      Suspicion...
      Yeah, you better have deep pockets to win. Pretty much screwed once they have hands on you. Average Joe is beat..

      Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

    9. Thanks born, Oldskool thanked for this post
      Likes born, Oldskool liked this post
    10. ----

    Similar Threads

    1. Becoming A Personal Trainer
      By PAiN in forum Bodybuilding
      Replies: 48
      Last Post: 05-29-2023, 09:01 PM
    2. Replies: 11
      Last Post: 01-03-2020, 01:19 AM

    Tags for this Thread

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •