-
Personal use bust.
United States Attorney's Office Boise Pursues Misdemeanor Steroid Possession Charge on Small Dianabol Parcel United States Attorney's Office Boise Pursues Misdemeanor Steroid Possession Charge on Small Dianabol Parcel
Many bodybuilders believe that the feds won’t pursue a case against an individual who attempts to import a single package of anabolic steroids for their own personal use. They generally expect to receive a seizure notice from customs as the worst case scenario. In fact, many bodybuilders receive multiple seizure notices over the years without any further consequence. But don’t tell that to Drew Rasmussen.
The feds pulled out all the stops when the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in Los Angeles inspected and intercepted a small package containing raw steroid powder sent from China that was addressed to Rasmussen’s apartment in Boise, Idaho on August 25, 2016. Rather than confiscate the steroids and send a seizure notice to Rasmussen, Homeland Security Investigation (HSI) agents worked with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) to arrange a controlled delivery at the Idaho man’s residence on September 1, 2016.
When Rasmussen signed and accepted the parcel containing steroids, police executed a search warrant on his apartment. Federal agents found nothing in his apartment to suggest anything other than personal use. There was no incriminating evidence to suggest that he operated any type of clandestine underground laboratory (UGL) to manufacture and distribute steroids. There were no computers or laptops with customers orders or customer lists. The only evidence they had against him was the 397 grams of methandienone or methandrostenolone (Dianabol) that just arrived in the package from China.
Rafael Gonzalez, Jr., the Acting United States Attorney for the District of Idaho, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Melissa Lou, decided to make an example out of Rasmussen even though he didn’t appear to be any type of local or Internet steroid dealer. The federal prosecutors originally charged Rasmussen with one count of unlawful felony possession of methandrostenolone according to the criminal charging information court documents.
It is true that 397 grams of Dianabol steroid powder clearly represents much more than a personal supply even though it can easily fit inside a relatively small parcel. That amount of Dianabol powder would permit Rasmussen to use a modest daily dosage of 50 milligrams of Dianabol for over 20 years. Then again, the feds found no additional evidence to suggest he was trafficking steroids.
Ultimately, the felony possession charges were reduced. Rasmussen pleaded guilty to one count of Class A misdemeanor possession of anabolic steroids (methandrostenolone) on March 10, 2017. Rasmussen admitted to researching steroids online and placing an order over the Internet from a Chinese powder source. Curiously, federal prosecutors were careful to note that Rasmussen used his Apple MacBook to purchase steroids and used his Apple iPhone to track the shipment status via the USPS website.
After pleading guilty, Rasmussen still faced a maximum of one year in prison and a maximum of $100,000 in fines. Fortunately for him, U.S. Magistrate Judge Candy Wagahoff Dale accepted the presentencing report from prosecutors and sentenced Rasmussen to only two years probation. She even waived the interest requirement on a $1000 fine because Rasmussen didn’t have the ability to pay the interest.
There are a few take home lesson from the Rasmussen case. The first is that there are far worse consequences than a seizure notice if customs intercepts a parcel containing steroids. Secondly, federal prosecutors will most definitely prosecute misdemeanor steroid possession cases. And finally, individual steroid users should carefully consider the consequences of ordering any quantity of steroid powder for personal use; while a couple hundred grams is incredibly cheap and doesn’t seem like that much, prosecutors could still interpret it as intent to distribute even though it was really intended as a personal supply. Prosecutors will then make you feel grateful that they are only pursuing a possession charge against you.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 13 Thanks, 13 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Chris_ECP,
Diesel1965,
Super Beasto,
Reliable_DNP,
KCMason35,
Loose Cannon,
allnattyjuice,
JUSTBASSIN,
scoobs88,
HalleHood,
Oldskool,
born,
T-Bagger thanked for this post
D.losa,
bigeyed,
Diesel1965,
Super Beasto,
Reliable_DNP,
KCMason35,
Loose Cannon,
JUSTBASSIN,
IronFox,
HalleHood,
Oldskool,
born,
T-Bagger liked this post
----
-
Originally Posted by
Bombarinos
Curiously, federal prosecutors were careful to note that Rasmussen used his Apple MacBook to purchase steroids and used his Apple iPhone to track the shipment status via the USPS website.
Thanks for this post. Very interesting.
Why did you describe this as "curious"? I ask because my understanding is that mere receipt of a package, without proof that the recipient ORDERED the package, is insufficient for prosecutors to obtain a conviction. Proof of order typically comes from one of two places - interrogation and/or the search warrant. In this case, it sounds like the buyer ordered and tracked his order via the clear web, without stealth, on his personal computer and phone. (Shit OPSEC, this, btw, for purhasing distribution quantities of a scheduled drug.) If that is correct, the fact that Rasmussen's PC/phone contained evidence of his order is crucial to making the case. Thoughts?
Also, any info on how customs found the drugs? Can't imagine they have a dianabol dog?!?
----
-
Originally Posted by
Reliable_DNP
Thanks for this post. Very interesting.
Why did you describe this as "curious"? I ask because my understanding is that mere receipt of a package, without proof that the recipient ORDERED the package, is insufficient for prosecutors to obtain a conviction. Proof of order typically comes from one of two places - interrogation and/or the search warrant. In this case, it sounds like the buyer ordered and tracked his order via the clear web, without stealth, on his personal computer and phone. (Shit OPSEC, this, btw, for purhasing distribution quantities of a scheduled drug.) If that is correct, the fact that Rasmussen's PC/phone contained evidence of his order is crucial to making the case. Thoughts?
Also, any info on how customs found the drugs? Can't imagine they have a dianabol dog?!?
go on NETFLIX and watch border security. America’s frontline. It will scare the shit out of you ordering over seas. It’s got me so paranoid. But my friend keeps telling me I’m alright. We don’t order enough to waste their money and time on. We get small amounts at a time. Even if we wait a month to order rest. It will show them seizing steroids on that show on Netflix.
Last edited by Snookslayer05; 08-13-2018 at 09:00 PM.
FAST LIFE
----
-
Originally Posted by
Reliable_DNP
Thanks for this post. Very interesting.
Why did you describe this as "curious"? I ask because my understanding is that mere receipt of a package, without proof that the recipient ORDERED the package, is insufficient for prosecutors to obtain a conviction. Proof of order typically comes from one of two places - interrogation and/or the search warrant. In this case, it sounds like the buyer ordered and tracked his order via the clear web, without stealth, on his personal computer and phone. (Shit OPSEC, this, btw, for purhasing distribution quantities of a scheduled drug.) If that is correct, the fact that Rasmussen's PC/phone contained evidence of his order is crucial to making the case. Thoughts?
Also, any info on how customs found the drugs? Can't imagine they have a dianabol dog?!?
A prosecutor can charge you for no reason.
Never forget that.
Suspicion...
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
born
A prosecutor can charge you for no reason.
Never forget that.
Suspicion...
Yeah, you better have deep pockets to win. Pretty much screwed once they have hands on you. Average Joe is beat..
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
I guess the Feds in Idaho have nothing better to do.....bastards.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 4 Likes, 0 Dislikes
G160 thanked for this post
----
-
Originally Posted by
Xtreme4Life
I guess the Feds in Idaho have nothing better to do.....bastards.
They should go after the moonshiners down there next hooch police lol
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
This right here is BS, Going after some one for this amount is a waste of taxpayer money, With all the Meth and coke flying in the money could be much better spent going after real criminals.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 4 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
vapor1
This right here is BS, Going after some one for this amount is a waste of taxpayer money, With all the Meth and coke flying in the money could be much better spent going after real criminals.
They're not going to be going after themselves..what's the matter with you!! Lol
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Originally Posted by
Electromass
They're not going to be going after themselves..what's the matter with you!! Lol
Exactly! Hypocrisy in action!
----
Bookmarks