-
Janoshik Exposed ?
To Vet Janoshik testing protocols we resent Flash labs Mast E from round #2 .
https://brotherhoodofpain.com/analyt...ts-posted.html
IMG_3851.jpg
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
----
-
I used same vial for both tests .
This was our Vetting process just as we sent 2 samples from same vial in round #1.
Will wait for Janoshik to comment before posting anymore results
Regards
DWBO
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
----
-
Yes, retest will commence at once to figure out the issue.
----
-
Source of problem identified, the previous result was good.
Only drostanolone enanthate samples ran in the latest batch (14-17th of February) are affected and have tested about 15% under their real content.
I will be fixing it as soon as possible.
----
-
Originally Posted by
littlefrank
But why?
-LF
Soverign Labs Rep
Either my assistant weighted the standard wrong, or there was something wrong with the standard of drostanolone enanthate itself.
----
-
Originally Posted by
Bullrush
See this why I don't beloved this testing .. Cause there are so many things that can go wrong. Then every one wants to bash the sponsor cause they had a bad test.
There are indeed hundreds of things that can go wrong even with the best of labs. However, most of them can influence the quantitative parameters, ie. mg/ml and 15% is rather extreme and bad luck.
They don't cause the content to go down 90%, switch compound or make a compound disappear at all.
I am not saying this all is not my fault - it 100% is and I am taking steps to prevent this from happening ever again. That along with a refund is all I can do.
----
-
Originally Posted by
JJ14
So is this with just the mast e testing? Or is this with all the other products that you tested? How many times do you think your assistant could of weighed something wrong?
So if dwbo didnt send this sample twice the results would of held. So now do we question all the other test you have done with all the other sponsers results that dwbo just posted.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
My assistant helped with weighting mast p and mast e, mast p came of same after retests, only problem was with mast e.
My assistant was helping me extensively first time - I received over 200 samples in a matter of a week and I couldn't possibly do it myself, so I needed help. Other than that I prefer to do everything myself.
However, still, I am not certain that there was a mistake made by the assistant.
----
-
Originally Posted by
Bullrush
And that was my point with the testing of Pomp's saizen hgh. You or your assistant could of made mistake. So now how can we no that the validity of your test are true , with one product tested 2 different times comes out with 2 different results...
As mentioned in the quoted post - it wouldn't cause 90% variance from the true result.
Also, HGH testing is free of errors such as these - there is no weighting involved at all.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
Bookmarks