-
Janoshik Exposed ?
To Vet Janoshik testing protocols we resent Flash labs Mast E from round #2 .
https://brotherhoodofpain.com/analyt...ts-posted.html
IMG_3851.jpg
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
----
-
Yes, retest will commence at once to figure out the issue.
----
-
Source of problem identified, the previous result was good.
Only drostanolone enanthate samples ran in the latest batch (14-17th of February) are affected and have tested about 15% under their real content.
I will be fixing it as soon as possible.
----
-
Originally Posted by
littlefrank
But why?
-LF
Soverign Labs Rep
Either my assistant weighted the standard wrong, or there was something wrong with the standard of drostanolone enanthate itself.
----
-
Originally Posted by
JJ14
So is this with just the mast e testing? Or is this with all the other products that you tested? How many times do you think your assistant could of weighed something wrong?
So if dwbo didnt send this sample twice the results would of held. So now do we question all the other test you have done with all the other sponsers results that dwbo just posted.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
My assistant helped with weighting mast p and mast e, mast p came of same after retests, only problem was with mast e.
My assistant was helping me extensively first time - I received over 200 samples in a matter of a week and I couldn't possibly do it myself, so I needed help. Other than that I prefer to do everything myself.
However, still, I am not certain that there was a mistake made by the assistant.
----
-
Originally Posted by
JJ14
So this is just with the mast e, prop. So all the other results posted with other sample are accurate or could there been a mistake with those samples to?
I get it that you over worked but I think people would rather wait weeks or even months to get accurate results. Who cares how long it takes rather have accurate results.
The issiue now is if there is a mistake with this sample now all samples will be questioned.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Assistant weighted mast p and mast e, mast p was good, mast e was not good.
Either assistant weighted wrong or something was wrong with mast e standard. Anyway, the blame is all mine, I should've cross referenced with older standards.
Other standards (testosterones, trenbolones, boldenones, nandrolones) were cross referenced with at least one more other standard.
---
Regarding the solution of this, I will consider leaving my other job, so I have more time for this and won't accept more than a certain amount of orders per month.
Last edited by janoshik; 02-17-2019 at 03:13 PM.
----
-
The gas chromatograph produces a separation of the compounds into it's individual components
The spectrometer separates those components into molecules that have been converted to ions.
It than sorts the ions by the mass-to-charge ratios collected by the detector. Where the ion flux is converted to a proportional electrical current used to produce a mass spectrum.
Even with simple samples the wait time has nothing to do with weighing ingredients
It is highly unlikely that Janoshik is able to analyze any sample sent.
but perhaps he is an alchemist with an advanced mortar and pestel degree.
https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/46209.pdf
Only Email contact:
**[email protected]
Will read all emails.
Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions
Sessions ID
052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks, 3 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
-
IMO he is, at best, an employee at a lab and using the equipment without the knowledge of the lab. I say this because he has proven he can positively identify things before.
I've done hours of research on Jano, even had a nasty and very public fallout with him here, and he's one slithery dude avoiding accountability at all costs. He dodged every one of my questions/accusations and mostly responded by slinging mud or throwing a question back at me. Nothing but negative verbal recourse in my experience with him.
DWBO - Is that your experience with Jano bro?
Last edited by Riggs; 06-21-2019 at 01:47 PM.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
----
Bookmarks