• Amused
  • Angry
  • Annoyed
  • ArrgPirate
  • atwork
  • Awesome
  • Bemused
  • Cocky
  • Cool
  • Crazy
  • Crying
  • deejayn
  • Depressed
  • Down
  • drinking
  • Drunk
  • eating
  • editing
  • Embarrased
  • Enraged
  • Friendly
  • gamingpc
  • gamingps
  • gamingsteam
  • gamingxbox
  • Geeky
  • Godly
  • Happy
  • hatemailing
  • Hungry
  • Innocent
  • lagging
  • livestreaming
  • loving
  • lurking
  • Meh
  • netflix
  • nostatus
  • Poorly
  • raging
  • Sad
  • Secret
  • Shy
  • Sneaky
  • Tired
  • trolling
  • Wtf
  • youtuber
  • zombies
  • Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
    Results 1 to 10 of 23

    Thread: Janoshik Exposed ?

    1. #1
      BOP ADMINISTRATOR
      is Thinking
       
      I am:
      ArrgPirate
       
      Dont wanna be old's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Near the powerrack
      Posts
      13,316
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      138846

      Janoshik Exposed ?

      To Vet Janoshik testing protocols we resent Flash labs Mast E from round #2 .
      https://brotherhoodofpain.com/analyt...ts-posted.html

      IMG_3851.jpg


      Only Email contact:
      **[email protected]
      Will read all emails.
      Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions

      Sessions ID
      052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311


    2. Thanks thebear thanked for this post
    3.    Sponsored Links

      ----
    4. #2
      BOP ADMINISTRATOR
      is Thinking
       
      I am:
      ArrgPirate
       
      Dont wanna be old's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Near the powerrack
      Posts
      13,316
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      138846


      Only Email contact:
      **[email protected]
      Will read all emails.
      Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions

      Sessions ID
      052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311


    5. Likes Raphael3289 liked this post
    6. ----
    7. #3
      BOP ADMINISTRATOR
      is Thinking
       
      I am:
      ArrgPirate
       
      Dont wanna be old's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Near the powerrack
      Posts
      13,316
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      138846


      Only Email contact:
      **[email protected]
      Will read all emails.
      Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions

      Sessions ID
      052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311


    8. ----
    9. #4
      BOP ADMINISTRATOR
      is Thinking
       
      I am:
      ArrgPirate
       
      Dont wanna be old's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2010
      Location
      Near the powerrack
      Posts
      13,316
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      138846
      I used same vial for both tests .
      This was our Vetting process just as we sent 2 samples from same vial in round #1.
      Will wait for Janoshik to comment before posting anymore results
      Regards
      DWBO


      Only Email contact:
      **[email protected]
      Will read all emails.
      Will not reply going forward to avoid malicious intentions

      Sessions ID
      052898656ca565dbc88a16a9bfcb3e19f553da021a91c6c6a0 ea3ea9f27f387311


    10. ----
    11. #5
      Banned
      is Owner of Janoshik Analytical
      company
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Dec 2017
      Posts
      66
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      716
      Yes, retest will commence at once to figure out the issue.

    12. ----
    13. #6
      Banned
      is Owner of Janoshik Analytical
      company
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Dec 2017
      Posts
      66
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      716
      Source of problem identified, the previous result was good.

      Only drostanolone enanthate samples ran in the latest batch (14-17th of February) are affected and have tested about 15% under their real content.


      I will be fixing it as soon as possible.

    14. ----
    15. #7
      Banned
      is Owner of Janoshik Analytical
      company
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Dec 2017
      Posts
      66
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      716
      Quote Originally Posted by littlefrank View Post
      But why?


      -LF
      Soverign Labs Rep
      Either my assistant weighted the standard wrong, or there was something wrong with the standard of drostanolone enanthate itself.

    16. ----
    17. #8
      Banned
      is Owner of Janoshik Analytical
      company
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Dec 2017
      Posts
      66
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      716
      Quote Originally Posted by Bullrush View Post
      See this why I don't beloved this testing .. Cause there are so many things that can go wrong. Then every one wants to bash the sponsor cause they had a bad test.
      There are indeed hundreds of things that can go wrong even with the best of labs. However, most of them can influence the quantitative parameters, ie. mg/ml and 15% is rather extreme and bad luck.

      They don't cause the content to go down 90%, switch compound or make a compound disappear at all.


      I am not saying this all is not my fault - it 100% is and I am taking steps to prevent this from happening ever again. That along with a refund is all I can do.

    18. ----
    19. #9
      Banned
      is Owner of Janoshik Analytical
      company
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Dec 2017
      Posts
      66
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      716
      Quote Originally Posted by JJ14 View Post
      So is this with just the mast e testing? Or is this with all the other products that you tested? How many times do you think your assistant could of weighed something wrong?

      So if dwbo didnt send this sample twice the results would of held. So now do we question all the other test you have done with all the other sponsers results that dwbo just posted.

      Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
      My assistant helped with weighting mast p and mast e, mast p came of same after retests, only problem was with mast e.

      My assistant was helping me extensively first time - I received over 200 samples in a matter of a week and I couldn't possibly do it myself, so I needed help. Other than that I prefer to do everything myself.

      However, still, I am not certain that there was a mistake made by the assistant.

    20. ----
    21. #10
      Banned
      is Owner of Janoshik Analytical
      company
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Dec 2017
      Posts
      66
      Post Thanks / Like
      Rep Power
      716
      Quote Originally Posted by Bullrush View Post
      And that was my point with the testing of Pomp's saizen hgh. You or your assistant could of made mistake. So now how can we no that the validity of your test are true , with one product tested 2 different times comes out with 2 different results...
      As mentioned in the quoted post - it wouldn't cause 90% variance from the true result.

      Also, HGH testing is free of errors such as these - there is no weighting involved at all.

    22. Thanks littlefrank thanked for this post
      Likes littlefrank liked this post
    23. ----
    Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Fake Homeless Man Exposed
      By PAiN in forum Videos Online
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 03-15-2014, 04:07 PM
    2. Replies: 1
      Last Post: 01-23-2014, 08:14 PM

    Tags for this Thread

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •